Dyslexia Identification Rates Vary Widely Across U.S. States

Dyslexia is one of the most common learning differences, yet how often it is officially identified can vary dramatically depending on where a student lives. Recent data highlights sharp differences in reported dyslexia rates among U.S. states, underscoring the role of local policies, awareness, and screening practices.

States with the Highest Reported Dyslexia Rates

Some states have developed strong early screening programs and invested in educator training, leading to higher rates of identification. These numbers don’t necessarily mean dyslexia is more common in these states. It might be a matter of weak screening.

• Mississippi reports the nation’s highest rate, with 22% of students identified as dyslexic.
  
  

• Arkansas follows at 18%.
  
  

• Louisiana ranks third, at 17%.
  
  

• Texas also reports a high figure, with about 15% of students identified.
  
  

States with the Lowest Reported Dyslexia Rates

In other states, the picture looks very different. Lower rates may reflect limited screening, inconsistent reporting, or lack of educator training—factors that can leave many students struggling without the support they need.

• Alaska reports just 4%, the lowest rate in the country.
  
  

• Nevada follows with 5%.
  
  

• Utah reports 6%, ranking third lowest.
  
  

• Within Texas itself, regional variation is striking: the El Paso region identifies only 3.1% of students as dyslexic, far below the state average.
  
  

Why the Gaps Exist

These disparities are driven less by actual prevalence and more by differences in policy and practice:

• Early Screening Requirements – States that mandate early dyslexia screening in elementary grades tend to report higher identification rates.
  
  

• Educator Training – Teacher preparation and ongoing professional development influence how effectively dyslexia is recognized in the classroom.
  
  

• Awareness and Advocacy – Public awareness campaigns and strong parent advocacy can drive school systems to implement more robust identification processes.
  
  

The Bigger Picture

Experts generally agree that the incidence of dyslexia is relatively consistent nationwide, affecting an estimated 15–20% of the population. The variation in state reporting reflects not true differences in prevalence, but in how well school systems are detecting and documenting cases.

This makes advocacy, awareness, and strong policy crucial. Students in states with lower reported rates may not have fewer challenges with reading; they may simply be going unidentified and unsupported.